The Thief
Posted: April 10, 2010 Filed under: Book of Sand Leave a comment{ 1996 | Greenwillow Books | 224 pgs }
In the words of Tracy Jordan, “Twist!”
Have you ever watched Ocean’s 12? That’s the one where they try to steal the egg, remember? At the end we find out they had successfully stolen it a while back. The Thief has a similar end-of-story plot twist with little, if any, foreshadowing.
Up until the final chapter, I enjoyed The Thief. The characters were interesting and fairly well-developed, the plot was captivating, and I wanted to know what happened next.
The problem was that the book was told in first person, and we were never given any indication that the narrator was not who he claimed to be until the last pages of the story. Suddenly the entire book was explained as being a giant plot twist. I can think of only one instance where the narrator said something that hinted he might have a different identity. Since Amazon says The Thief is intended for readers age 9-12, I doubt that most readers were able to piece together the true story from such lacking foreshadowing. It just wasn’t any fun to find out at the end that the plot was half-hidden.
The writing is good, and, as I said, the story is interesting, but I wasn’t impressed with the Ocean’s 12-esque ending. Maybe kids age 9-12 will enjoy?
The Forest of Hands and Teeth
Posted: April 10, 2010 Filed under: Book of Sand 1 Comment{ 2009 | Delacorte Books for Young Readers | 320 pgs }
Would you like to read a book about zombies?
This isn’t the one to read.
The Forest of Hands and Teeth is about a post-apocalyptic village (with a Middle Ages feel) completely surrounded by fences to keep out the Unconsecrated (read: zombies). The Unconsecrated are those who have been infected, briefly died, and then returned as living dead whose only drive is to eat flesh.
The main character, Mary, believes the stories her mother told her, passed down through generations, about the ocean. A beautiful, enormous stretch of water where there are no Unconsecrated. Throughout the heartbreak and tragedy of her younger years, Mary wonders if the ocean really does exist, but is forced to accept the reality that her village contains the only survivors in the world and they must stay where they are.
I hope you don’t mind if I spoil the plot a little. If you do, skip ahead a bit.
{ SPOILER SECTION }
Love triangle (rhombus?), death, nuns, a visitor from outside. Mary learns – although it is kept secret by the nuns – that there are other survivors when a girl about her age arrives from another village. She is not infected, but the nuns lock her up. Mary is a sneaky, too-curious-for-her-own-good young woman who talks to the girl (Gabrielle) and decides to investigate. More love rhombus, more love rhombus, more nuns; in the midst of a love rhombus scene, Mary sees Gabrielle on the other side of the fence protecting the village – Gabrielle is now one of the Unconsecrated, and she’s fast, unlike the other zombies who are slow and clumsy. After more too-curious-for-her-own-good investigation, Mary learns that the nuns released Gabrielle into the forest because they knew it would make her into a superzombie.
The next day, the village is attacked! Gabrielle has figured out a way to get in, because she’s a smart superzombie. Mary, her fiance Harry, her love interest Travis (Harry’s brother), and Travis’ fiancee Cassandra (Mary’s best friend) all manage to escape through a protected path leading out of the village. So do Mary’s brother Jed and his wife. Oh, and a little boy they grabbed along the way.
Big spoiler: everyone in the village dies.
{ END OF SPOILER SECTION }
Alright. So Mary and her friends are trying to survive. That’s the point of the book. Unfortunately, Mary is one of the most annoying characters ever written.
At the beginning of the book, she decides she’ll be happy if she could just go to the Harvest Festival (prom?) with Travis, but gets asked by Harry. Then no one ends up taking her, and she just wants to be spoken for. By Harry, sure. Then she falls in love with Travis and is heartbroken because she can’t be with him. Harry speaks for Mary. She has a talk with Travis. She decides that all she needs to be happy is to be with Travis.
Then once they’re trying to survive, and she has Travis, more or less, she decides that all she needs to be happy is to find the village Gabrielle came from. They finally find it, and now she has a nice cozy house for just her and Travis. But soon she finds another reason to be unhappy: the woman whose house they’re living in is most likely one of the Unconsecrated milling around outside, but what if she has managed to escape and she’s in some other village and no one will remember her story? What if no one remembers Mary’s story? Travis reassures her that he’ll remember, he’ll be part of her story. This is not good enough.
Mary sulks. And sulks. And eventually decides that what she needs to be happy is to find the ocean.
That’s right – she got the guy, and the happy life, and she started actively looking for more reasons to be dissatisfied. She just doesn’t want to be content. Did I mention I really can’t stand Mary? She’s willing to sacrifice everyone she loves – and to make them sacrifice themselves – for the sake of the ocean. Another spoiler: she gets to the ocean, and there are still zombies.
Aside from Mary’s character flaws (which are numerous), I had too many unanswered questions about the plot. Why did the nuns release Gabrielle into the forest? This, to me, was a gaping hole that absolutely required filling in. It seems utterly lazy of the author to have brought it up once and never addressed it again. I would have liked to hear a little more about the origins of the Unconsecrated, since there was plenty of downtime with Mary sitting reading old newspapers. (Yes, it was boring.)
Bottom line, this book was too much Mary and not enough zombies.
SKIP IT.
I hate you, Payless
Posted: April 2, 2010 Filed under: War and Peace 7 CommentsHere’s a typical situation: the Romgi and I are at a store. We’ve collected our awesome purchases and brought them up to the cashier. She scans them, puts them in a bag, and as I swipe my debit card she asks, “Can I get your phone number/zip code?”
I sigh. “Do you need it?” I respond.
She says something about “information purposes” or an equally incoherent phrase. So I decline.
The Romgi shakes his head and walks away. As we walk out of the store, he asks me why I couldn’t just give them my phone number (or zip code). Grouchily, I tell him that I don’t like them having my information.
Today, faithful readers, the Romgi admitted that I was totally right.
We’d gone to Payless recently to replace my one pair of black shoes (I bought the old ones in 2006), and just to make the Romgi’s life easier I gave the cashier my phone number. Actually, just to be ornery, I gave her the Romgi’s phone number. And we left the store without issue.
BUT TODAY.
Today the Romgi got a text message from Payless!
PAYLESS thx U 4 giving us ur #! Get 20% off ur next purchase w/code 33079 thru 4/11
Maybe this doesn’t seem like a big deal to you, especially since I was able to call and use an automated system to remove the Romgi’s number from their mailing list. But it’s a HUGE deal to me. Unsolicited texts! Those cost ME money! Email is one thing – it’s easy to click unsubscribe or even call it spam. But a text seems much more invasive (and can I point out again, it costs me money to receive).
The Romgi wonders if this could make a class-action lawsuit.
Regardless, I now feel completely justified in flat-out refusing to give my phone number to stores now. I spoke with a Payless customer service guy over the phone, and he explained that they do collect phone numbers for “marketing,” which I never would have anticipated to mean “We will sign you up for our text message mailing list and bombard you with stupid messages.”
Fail, Payless.


