Victory is Mine!
Posted: May 23, 2011 Filed under: Importance of Being Earnest 5 CommentsDo you really hate getting unsolicited advertisements over text? I do. So after a local company texted me twice in three days, I decided to do something about it. Here is the email that I sent to the customer care email address for each of the three companies. Background information: the Pass of All Passes, is a season pass that allows you go to to the local water park (Seven Peaks) and mini-golf/arcade center (Trafalga). I had never heard of Fizook before May 21.
Seven Peaks, Trafalga and Fizook Deals,
When I signed up for the “pass of all passes” I was required to give my personal information. I was not told, or made aware in any way shape or form, that I would be receiving text messages to my personal cell phone. I do not have unlimited texting and I am charged $0.20 for each text you send to my phone. http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/messaging-internet/messaging/faq.jsp
The first text was sent at 11:11 AM on Saturday, May 21 and had the message:
Trafalga Pass of All Pass Holders- Special VIP Offer, $10 Bucks Gets You An Appetizer, Combo Meal & A $10 Playcard. Learn More/Buy It Now @ www.fizookdeals.com
The second message was send at 4:29 Monday, May 23 and contained the following:
Trafalga Customers Last Chance For- Special VIP Offer $10 Bucks Gets You An Appetizer, Combo Meal & A $10 Playcard. Learn More/Buy It Now @ www.fizookdeals.com
I will be as clear as possible. I do not want your texts. Do not send me your unsolicited and unwanted text messages. Remove all of my contact information from your systems. I do not wish to receive text messages from either of your companies ever again. If the world is burning down and you are the only people in the world with access to text messaging, do not text me. If your very life depends on being able to text me, do not text me. I do not care one bit about your deals, sales, or promotions. In fact, this whole ordeal has ensured that I will never purchase anything from either of your two companies.
I consider this a gross abuse of my personal information. What makes it worse is that this was done without my consent. While writing this I ran across an interesting case. Are you aware that Payless Shoes recently had a class action lawsuit filed against it for a similar practice? http://www.courthousenews.com/2009/10/30/Spam.pdf The different between text advertising and other forms of advertisement is that I am directly forced to pay for your advertisement.
Here is a simple list of what I want. I have tried to make this as absolutely simple as possible:
1) I want my name (Romgi the Enigma) and phone number (XXX-XXX-XXXX) removed from any and all advertising databases at Seven Peaks, Trafalga, and Fizook Deals
2) I do not want to ever receive a text message from either Seven Peaks, Trafalga or Fizook Deals in the future
3) I do not want to ever get a text message from any of the subsidiaries or affiliates of Seven Peaks, Trafalga, or Fizook Deals
If your reply to this email does not address and promise those three things, I will send an itemized bill for each of the text message I have received. If I have not received a response to this email within 10 business days (Monday, June 6, 2011), I will consider this a refusal to respond and I will send an itemized bill for each of the text messages I have received. If you refuse the pay the bill within 30 days, I will begin the process of filing a lawsuit to recover damages under 47 U.S.C. 227 titled “Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment” http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/47/5/II/I/227 . Please note that this federal law prohibits unsolicited advertisements being sent to a person’s telephone. Yes, I am talking about a total of $0.40 of damages, but I am tired of companies such as you costing me money. I have had enough.
Best regards,
The Romgi
I sent that email today around 5:34 and I received a reply at 7:44. I was a bit surprised to get such a quick response. I was sure they would dilly-dally for days before getting back to me.
Romgi,
You have been removed from the Trafalga/Seven Peaks/Fizook Deals Databases.
Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you.
If for any reason you receive a text/email from fizook deals ever again in the future please contact me directly as this should not happen.
[Redacted]
Senior VP of Sales & Marketing
Apparently, the email went from “customer care” up the ranks to the VP quite quickly! I will forever cherish this small victory.
In re Tom Morvolo Riddle
Posted: May 17, 2011 Filed under: Importance of Being Earnest 3 CommentsMr. Neville Longbottom,
It has come to our attention that you are responsible for the willful and wanton destruction of the personal property of Tom Morvolo Riddle, alias Voldemort. I am writing to you as the personal representative of the late Mr. Riddle’s estate. This letter is to inform you that we demand fair and just compensation for the willful killing of Mr. Riddle’s service animal, Nagini the snake.
Testimony from witnesses indicates that late in the evening of May 2, 1998 you did draw the sword commonly atributed to Sir Godric Gryffindor. Using this sword, you did, with knowledge of your actions and intent to destroy, cut the snake Nagini in two. Nagini was killed instantly.
It is our assertion, that Mr. Riddle suffered from a disability, and that Nagini was service animal specifically trained to ameliorate that disability.
Mr. Riddle suffered from a disability. A disability is defined at law as “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities” of an individual. Examples of applicable physical or mental impairments include, but are not limited to, “any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting . . . [the] respiratory” system. Further more, the law states that any “emotional or mental illness” may constitute a disability.
It has been well documented that in the last several years of his life, Mr. Riddle lived with a severe deformity of the nose. Witness reports indicate that it was “snakelike.” This would clearly classify as a physical deformity as defined by the law above. Furthermore, Mr. Riddle was operating under the delusion that he could achieve immortality, which may be an indication of an “emotional or mental illness” which affected one or more of his major life activities.
Nagini was a service animal. A service animal means any “animal individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability.” An example of an applicable work or task includes but is not limited to “fetching dropped items.” On several occasions, witnesses have testified that they have seen Nagini go to retrieve items for Mr. Riddle. Such items include a possibly relevant prophesy located in the Ministry of Magic. It is obvious that substantial training went into getting this sort of behavior. We maintain that the snake was so trained because Mr. Riddle was unable to leave his residence due to his disability or disabilities.
A police report has been filed in conjunction with this letter. We would be willing to discuss withdrawal of the complaint in exchange for a fair and reasonable settlement. We look forward to hearing your settlement offer, and hope to put this act of violence in the past.
Sincerely,
Romgi T. Enigma, Solicitor
Black Malfoy Lestrange & Associates
65 Knockturn Alley
London
United Kingdom
Now remember that this post is just for fun. Magical folk probably don’t abide by muggle laws either way. Just to be clear, I am not an attorney, lawyer, barrister or solicitor.
Communal Restaurant (Breakfast/Brunch) – Provo, UT
Posted: May 1, 2011 Filed under: James and the Giant Peach Leave a commentCommunal has been generating a lot of buzz in the Provo area. With its focus on local, sustainable foods and quality presentation, those who have eaten there were most likely not surprised when Communal won the Best of State award in the New American category. Communal offers separate menus for brunch, lunch and dinner. Roni and I decided to give the Communal brunch menu a try, and we were largely impressed with our experience.
Every time I tell somebody about about Communal, the question inevitably comes up, “Why is it called Communal?’ I think a quick glance at the menu and the decor of this establishment can quickly answer the question. The first reason I would guess that restaurant is named “communal” is that whenever possible, the menu items come from local or community farms. Much of the meat seems to come from Christiansen Farm, while much of the produce comes from Jacob’s Cove, both local endeavors. The second reason I conjecture the restaurant is called Communal is that a large portion of the dining area is taken up by a large community dining table, as opposed to individual dining tables. This allows individuals to sit around a joint table, much as a family would gather around the dinner table. Finally, the dishes themselves lend themselves to community eating. Instead of each individual getting their own plate, one large plate of the ordered item is brought out and everybody shares from the plate.
In general, the service was responsive and helpful. Our server did take quite a while to come and get our order, but once he did he was quite good about making sure our glasses stayed full and attending to our needs. On a less awesome note, I did find that several mystery bits floating in my water, and Roni’s fork had several bits of food stuck to it. Considering that the water is supposed to be super-filtered pH balanced water, it was a bit disappointing to see bits floating in the water before we even received our food.
By far the best part of the experience, however, was the food. Roni ordered the eggs Benedict and I ordered the sausage and biscuits with a side of bacon. The eggs Benedict were perfect. The poached egg was expertly executed with a warm and creamy yolk that spilled out with the first bite. I thought the lemon in the hollandaise sauce nicely balanced the richness of the yolk, but Roni found the lemon a bit strong. The eggs came with a side of potatoes that were perfectly seasoned and cooked. The biscuits and gravy were perhaps even better than the eggs Benedict. The biscuit was crisp on the outside and tender on the inside. The biscuit was large, but the gravy was generously supplied. The gravy was savory, and wasn’t overly peppery (as I have found many country-style gravies can be). The house-made sausage was slightly sweet and provided a nice contrast to the savory gravy. The bacon, which is cured and smoked on site, had a full smoky flavor which was quite pleasant. It was, however, a bit tough and hard to chew.
Overall our experience was quite good. Reservations are a generally a good idea, though we have been able to get a table with a short wait. If we could find somebody to watch our kids in the morning, I think we would go back much more frequently. On that note, this is definitely not a place to bring young children. Hire a babysitter (or guilt a relative!) and go to Communal. It is worth it.
Category: Fine Dining
Food Quality: 5
Taste: 4.5
Portion Size: 4.5
Service: 4
Overall Experience: 4.5
price (per item): $6-16
tl;dr: Leave the kids at home and enjoy the excellent food of Communal. It is worth the hype!
Communal Restaurant
100 North University Avenue
Provo, Utah 84601

